Why should we cry?

A long gap of 121 years. India won a medal from  Olympic gatherings again.But this time it was not a silver nor a bronze, but most desirable Gold.This is the first time India has won three medals in the same year in under-20 world athletics.Despite the delays, many are esping some improvement in Indian athletics. That is not unusual.But what is the scenario of our golden Bengal?

There was a proverb,'Morning shows the day'.Hopefully Bengal has lost its morning very earlier. At 1900 Paris Olympics, Norman Pritchard, a boy from Calcutta, won two silver medals in 200m run and 200m hurdles.

However, there was a controversy whether the medals belong to Great Britain or India, but at present India owns them.India officially sent a team to the Olympics in 1920 at Antwerp.A bengali athlete Purnachandra Banerjee was in that  Indian athletics team.In 1952, Indian women athletes joined Olympics as a team where Nilima ghosh was a representative of Bengal.1951, Asian Games. Bengal had five representatives in Indian team.But after then an ignorance preveiled .The importance of gaming and body building in the life style  is still not recognized by this poor Bengalies.Years after years, the athletic world of Bengal has been raped by few people and few organizations.

In most of the Bengali newspapers, even after winning gold in the Junior National Competition in athletics, there remains no place for that male or female athletes  who are from poor rural families.But if you open the sports page of a newspaper,a story about the separation of Mohammad Sami vs. Hasin Jahan will grab your eyes surely.What a dilemma!    

    

    In 1972, when the Munich Olympics was underway and Legislative sessions were going on in our state at the same time then one MLA was saying something about the Olympics. Interrupting him State Education Minister Mrityunjaya Banerjee, a professor by profession, said 'where the Olympics is going on?' This is our sports culture!

       The Sports school, which was opened in Banipur in 2001 at the initiative of the state government,if you see it's condition now,you will be depressed surely.You can argue that state government are distributing money to countless clubs in different parts of the state now.But we are all aware of what happens with that money.Talents come from sports schools in different countries but here it is nothing but a business.

It was 1987 or 1988. Kerala was in its peak  timing when all national  medals were grabbed by their girls  with full ease. But that time also Bengal girls defeated them and broke their pride. But now? Bengal won only one medal in the 600m run in girls category at the Junior National Athletics in Guwahati in last February (Tahura Khatun).In this august Bengal  captured only two medals from Fedaration cup,one gold(Muhammad Asraf Ali)and a bronze (Aparna ghosh).Will it be our destiny?

We give more importance or blame the word 'Infrastructure'.Now we are saying we don't have the infrastructure. But if we go back a little, we can see when the center of Sai Purbanchal Centre or Yuvbharati sports ground has not been built and the only place to practice athletics was Rabindra Sarobar Stadium then also Bengal produced a lot of talents.But now the changed government  restricted the entrance  of athletes  there.But they made a artificial track by spending a lot of bucks,why? There are no answer to be given.If I left the role of the government, the officials of the athletics cannot avoid the responsibility. The state athletics organization has no office of its own even after so many achievements.Is this how sports are played?

The great success of any state creates an environment  there.You can witness when Kunjrani Devi got silver and bronze in weight-lifting or Dinko singh got gold  in Asian cup 1998 the sports atmosphere  of manipur has changed.As a result we get Merry com or Mira Bai Chanu.But after having a legend like Jyotirmoyee Sikdar we cannot  make a change. All the excitements ended only in congratulations.Yet Soma Biswas, Sanjay Roy, Saraswati Saha, Susmita Singh Roy, Harishankar Roy, Pinky Pramanik,Debashree Majumder, Swapna Varman came up only with their determination  and their coaches' struggle.There was no contribution of State at all.How far can we go in this way?

Even if other states tell us how to fight in adverse conditions, Bengal cannot  adopt it.Bengal Athletics Training Centers are becoming the arena for getting jobs now.By hook or crook the trainees  run only to get a job to lead the life.Lots of problems are there,but whatever the situation may be, let the Bengal athletics stay whether they are asleep or indifferent otherwise  we cannot expect  even the rarest  hope like Sima Punia from this dead land,isn't it?

The Reverse Volt....

Coming out of the players is now giving ten goals to the cumming out of the homosexuals.Many a time,Losers are more valued in Art in sympathatic ground.But it is not possible to think of giving importance to a player who is leaving his game for ankle sprain rather than the player who runs fast in sports.Conceling the wounds behind the bandage,fluttering of mind under the jersy players jumped out for the game on the moment without any hesitation. It is quite common scenario.Now if they shamelessly demand a rest  showing their mental illness how should we react? Suppose Ben Stoke takes an indefinite leave before the India-England Test series due to mental problems or Gymnast Simon Byles says, "I'm not in the mood. I won't go to the event."Then? 

Observing this many will scratch their heads or condemn it otherwise they can say, "it is a hoax".Mental health has never been considered as an important issue till today. But now many psychologists will get a chance to be happy if that recognition can be achieved.But if any one will not go down to play saying that, "I am afraid", isn't  it a little embarrassing to hear ? How would you feel if Rabindranath said that as his child is dead he would not write anymore?

Byles' teammate Sunisa Lee, who was paralyzed in an accident, won a silver medal in the 100m hurdles at the Devers World Championship and a gold medal in the 100m race in the following year. At the age of 13, Bethany Hamilton,a rising star of surfing was attacked by a shark and lost her left arm and the following year she won the national competition. If they surrendered to the difficulties,how can these records be achieved?

 Now any one can demand that he wants to have the story of defeat, not a story of success.Ok that's good-it is an new artistic idea also. But the question is what should  be followed-stubbornness or mental weakness with which one can't fight back to dominate the difficulties? If anyone lose the game,showing violence towards him is wrong but how giving up will become one's absolute virtue? We may be sympathatic for those players who says, they can't, but it will  be a mega problem if inability deserves more than success.To be a big player one has to polish his talents regularly, but  it is not enough if he doesn't learn how to handle extreme stress in certain moment.The greatest achievement of man is the self whip.Now the point is ,there are shortage of places to keep medals at the home of Simon Byle or Sachin Tendulkar  or Leonel Messi,but following  that if the willing rising stars do not overcome their shortcomings, will they be able to grow up?

The flood of political correctness has stirred up tolerance and sympathy.The image of multidimensional people is trying to erase the one-sided idea about people and wants to teach us how to accept  all things and not to reject them- it is always  good to hear.But...We need to know that we should not make fun of the player when he is upset. But that doesn't mean the injury is beyond of repair right now.

The duties of human beings remains in the demands.

So,they who have been able to throw themselves repeatedly into the challenge, I believe only they can create a unique identity.While showing generosity towards inferiority, we should not underestimate the effort of being superior, that's the primary worry.If  we start to care the reluctance more saying ,'Oh Dear,you don't have to go to school anymore, burst your eys into tears.' then without giving birth of some flashy tweet and bad human nature can we expect some more for us, what is your opinion?

Kick it off

Once Bob Marley said , 'Football is freedom. Even when the world keeps breaking, football continues with its building. A new civilization will be formed breaking all the past records on the green carpet of the football ground."This football ground gave us the messages from labor movements to terrorist attacks, peasant's cry to soldier's sacrifice, national unity to corporate aggression since history. But today, the flames of diversion are burning in this ground.And we wre witnessing  that silently.

It was 27th april, 2014 Villarreal supporters threw bananas at Brazilian footballer Dani Alves during the Barcelona vs Villarreal match.Alves picked up the banana in protest and ate it.Within a few days, Neymar and other players protested the incident sharing pictures in their social media handles.Mesut Ozil announced his retirement from international football on July 22, 2018 saying that if he wins, he will remain a German in the eyes of the supporters,otherwise he will become an intruder.What a fuss is this?What kind of civilization  are we bearing now?The vortex of hatred has penetrated into the capitalist controlled society now.The game of love is being corrupted.The ingredient which will be used in the future lies in the environment in which people grows up.Here lies the problem. The football field is paying the price for not presenting the antidote of unity infront of that mass who grew up in this society having the capsules of diversity everyday.

On October 1, 2021,Prague,Czech Republic, racism prevented supporters from entering into the football field.Rangers vs Sparta Prague match started allowing only school footballers in the gallery.What a prottection! But during the match, racist insults were hurled at the Rangers' Finnish footballer Glen Kamara by one of that  young school footballers.The incident proves that the mentality of accepting the message of unity of football field has not been spread at all levels of this poor society.

However, the goal of the football is to cut the darkness and deliver the light.The water cannon to extinguish the fire of hatred can only be appeared in the football ground.Champions know how to turn an injury into success.September 2019, England vs Bulgaria match.Some bulgarian fans began to criticize England's black players.To protest the insult England scored 6 goals in that match against Bulgaria without uttering a single word.Bulgarian lost their audacity. Hatred can never smile last smile,keep it in mind.

Now come to 2020-21 Euro Cup Final.Rashford missed the Penalty against Italy.Anger raised up.A group of racists posted some black papers on the graffiti in withington near his house where his face was painted in a wall.What a shame! But for whom? Protesting the fact, people across England sent their greetings and messages of love to Rashford.This fact proves that the victory of love in the fight against violence is inevitable.

The game will turn surely.The football field will not end in hatred.Have faith in the words of Thierry Henry, "A lot of different races and nationalities play football.So it is a good way to try and stop racism."Have faith in football.A bullet shot will break the wall of diversion surely.We have to wait only for the right time with proper manner, can't we?

Artist or Person:Who should win?

When massaging his wife for a while, French philosopher Louis Althusser noticed that his wife's eyes were fixed on him and he understood that he had killed his wife in a reluctant manner.He himself called the police. An uproar began.One group said that," The man is a 'Murderer' ".

Another said, "A murderer should be punished.But will his thoughts as an artist become worthless then?"

Picasso was savage in nature and he used to treat girls like blankets,that's why should we turn away from his paintings? If you think Jibanananda Das was a misogynist after having 'Malyaban', yet will you dare to give him a negative marking for his composition? Look,make it clear.If a genius does molestation, there is no need to protest harshly because he has a lot to gain from the world rather than common,isn't it right?In order to nurture such talents, it is necessary to crush some common people under the altar.It helps to flourish artistic roses on human bones.Am I wrong?

Once during the shooting, a cat caressed Charlie Chaplin's hand, so Chaplin effortlessly killed the cat, stuffed him and brought him to continue the shooting.Does that mean we're going to critisize him in this aspect keeping his acting,dialogue or direction aside? If your answer is 'No', so where is the problem with that person who doesn't have artistic genious but gets a prize by his personality?

Actually in all cases, the camp is divided into two. The first camp says, "One man has the same persona in every time.So If you hate him on Monday,you can't respect him on Tuesday."The other camp says," A person is actually an ammulgamation of lot of personas. With the right attitude, One has to decide which one  he has to accept."

Now if you judge Bill Clinton separately in terms of politics, again swallow Sunil Gangopadhyay's novel as a fan of literature, but become upset when it comes to his personal life,then ask yourself,are you in right position to judge?

If a cricketer beats his wife at home and with same force beats the opponent's ball in the field, will you stop taking him to the national team? Lenny Riefenstahl was a great director of the German film.Her Nazi propaganda movies reached the climax of the propaganda film and even how she portrayed the Olympics,that opened a new horizons in sports photography.But she was banned to make films after second world war because she was a supporter of Nazism. According to many, it was a good punishment but many may not think so. Then what is the way?

Some time ago, a Kolkata-based playwright dropped an actor from a left-wing drama because he had joined a fascist group.Some Bengalis said then,"It was a good decision" Again, one big director of Kolkata wrote objecting the fact that political thinking and acting talent should be looked at separately.Well, if a supporter of a fascist group can skillfully speak out against fascism, then why shouldn't we look at his work?Afterall,Art exists on the basis of collectivity, if there is no mutual respect in it, then why this type of work is really needed now?

Suppose you are a playwright. You say in your dialogues, "I am a Muslim, is that my crime?"But in the same time you are saying in mind, "let the Muslims be perished", is it possible to tolerate it with a open mind?Should there be any moral turmoil or not?

In our case, however, we have mastered ourselves in the art of forgiving.It is better to say, even self-kick, self-slander donot make Bengalie a little thinker.The Bengalies who think that it is shameful to have many women besides his wife, they also goes for Ravi Shankar's Sitar without any hesitation.Even when we know Rabindranath gave dowry to his daughter's marriage,though we donot protest against his hypocrisy when he wrote 'Dena Paona', a story against dowry system.

Are we working as mature life customers to enjoy the harvest of talent with open mind?Are we indulging too much power to ridicule the artist in the name of relentless literary pursuits keeping another one thirsty? If the person and the artist are different, will it really solve our problem? Lets think about it.

Should Opus be oppressed?

Can you remember Rabindranath Tagore's ear rubbing law in 'Land of cards'?Is it creating a hitch in your ear?why am I telling this? Now,listen if you are a art practitioner and do your job responsibly, you have to aware of that.I think you know,that a quiet and humble theater has always been a friend of the state apparatus, but as soon as it waxed restlessness it became the enemy and the critic of the state.If you do a theater for the society, you have to endure this punishment in this unfortunate country where the judge of art is the very guards of the state. 'Surendra Binodini' by Dakshinaranjan Chattopadhyay,'Cha Kar Darpan' by Upendranath Das, Amritlal Basu's 'Gaikwad Darpan', 'Sati Ki Kalankini' or 'Sirajdaula' by Girish Chandra Ghosh, Bhupen Bandyopadhyay's 'Village swadeshikata' everyone had to suffer this.The theater had to face the red eyes of the state in this unfortunate province, but what about the world?

Now,If we look at the European countries, we can witness Roma rola also inevitably became the eyesore of the ruler by doing a theater of human liberation.In a country even like France, true artist has to stay behind a veil of Censorship.Censorship has historically served the interests of the church and the state since the past.Interference in the theater, for whatever reason, is always a political move.Just as the Catholic Church in medieval England dominated the mystery drama,like that in 1581 the Master of the Rebels was ordered to destroy the art, which was detrimental to the state. Even while Shakespeare was in London, censorship was still on the rise.Yet it has not been easy to capture a genius like Shakespeare by state's protocol.Though it reflected its weight in its own way.

Just as' Dr. Faustus' was trapped in censorship, so Ben Johnson's 'Ice of Dog', Shakespeare's 'Richard II', Thomas Middleton's 'Game of Chess' were the victims of state vigilance.In France, Luis XIII sought to lift censorship, but the kingsmen denied.According to them the theater must be held in the fist of state.World-famous satirical play 'Tartuffe' was banned for five years in his time.Cultured minded British even captured the freedom of theater for more than 231 years with Theater Regulation Act in his own land.Aleksandar Duma's 'La Dame aux Camelias',

Ibson's 'Ghosts',Tolstoy's 'Power of Darkness', Barnardshaw's 'Mrs Warren's Profession',Pushkin's 'Boris Godunov' also suffered the same.After all we feel abashed when we hear Pirandolla's 'Six characters in search of an author', John Osborne's 'A patriot for me'  took their directors' life in stake.When Europe is so conservative,can you imagine what did happen to Brazil, Chile, Argentina in the turbulent environment of South America?

It is not the State, that always wanted to strangle the language of theater,although art practitioners who welcomed the revolutionary role of theater in educating the masses after the French Revolution,dropped the anti-republican word like 'Duke','Baron','Count' from their play to make the theater more republican.Milan Kundera and Pavel Kohut's plays were similarly banned in Czechoslovakia.Although the US government did not intervene directly,they cut off the funding only.

However, Guys in the theater did not stop fighting against all types of intervention.'Stage Society of England', 'Theater Arts Club' of London, 'Cambridge Festival Theater' stops government intervention in theater with loud voice.

But here a question arises.How will the theater reach to the people if there is a direct fear to be banned?Utpal Dutta reminds us of the 'Mirror' but Shakespeare never said that the mirror of life which theater reflecte would be smooth for ever.Thoigh in Indian mythology we see Yudhisthira tells Sanjay to bow down to those who performs drama in Hastinapur.Even in the sixth century, Shudrak's 'Mrichakatikam' was honored with all the political hints as Visakhadatta's 'Mudrarakkhasa' got proper homage for its worth in the ninth century. In our land of diversion a drama like 'Chaturvani' which is about physical sexuality can served with proper respect, where the rest of the world are seeking its fault in formation ,even now.

Now we can ask,Why should we search the prevailing statement of failure throughout history? Theater is not just about expressing opinions,it is human storm.Can a storm be stopped?Then what is our flutter?Keep it in mind clearly, that the  respect of the theater is the respect of the pricks. So save the theater to save the morality but not through the use of force, only through dialogue.

Should Surrealism send a Sirius to the Screen?

An Andalusian  dog howls-who then is dead?

-Jean Vigo

Then our autopsy revealed that the dream has its own manifesto and a secret agenda.Dream surely will attack on a seemingly simple one-line transparent narrative of us.We are in danger. Do the corpses of those simple narratives buried in the dark, remain somewhere in our mind subconsciously in any form?From that guilt of this assassination and in its atonement do we arrange a different narrative presentation and consequent tendency in our art?This question is based on the traditional conflict between dreams and reality which is also reflected in our movies from since behind.

The history of cinema is infact, the history of the absolute domination of sight,isn't it? From that history,thought architecture is still bearing the mark of the might of European reality.When Eisenstein's warships landed at the port of Cinema, we immediately immortalized that thought architecture.However, it takes time to come to the conclusion that reality is not a sensory guarantee, it is a relative plural voice. Our mind which is overwhelmed with bourgeois taste, awoke atonce in shock in a contest when Baudelaire,

 Lorca or Eluard tried to place the soul of art on Cobra's tongue.'The Creator will no longer play the role of God.He will search for another light and another sound"-that was the moto of theirs .In one fine twilight, between the two world wars,One Louis Bunuel also released a ferocious dog in our aesthetically decorated self-contained room to shatter our  thoughts and philosophy of century.And,after that?...

                                 Eisenstein's Theory

...Movie hold the hand of surrealism like a cheater boyfriend,stabbing the reality from the back .In the meantime, the Impressionist-style French movies were trying to break our familiar habits.Once again, expressionism became the mainstay of German cinema.Bunuel says that if surrealism did not come, it wouldn't be possible to call the UniChienAndalou. Surrealism however, to him was not merely an art form but a morality from which he had severed all ties between religion and politics, love and sex.

                        Surrealism in Modern Cinema 

With the scene of destruction of an eyeball,ripped through the middle by a razor, Bunuel meant that he wanted to expose the underlying truth of the scene by tearing apart the extraterrestrial reality that the eye sees.A cyclist on a deserted street in Paris, a broken palm lying on the street, two donkey's carcasses, two tied pianos, insects crawling out of a hand stuck in the doorway, why says differently?

                      Merchant of surrealism in Cinema

 Because those cinema wanted to shatter all our well-established narratives about love, sex and religion by ruthless sharp satire.Symbols killed our collective myth with metaphors. Like a dream, seemingly causal relationships painted a picture of the despicable secret world of lust and passion.The inhabitants of this world were running like a snake in search of prey behind the beautiful masks of civilization. The scenario evoked unexplained excitement and liberation. We were witnessing the ultimate despair and madness.

Brett said in his 'Second Manifesto of Surrealism', 'We should jump down the street with a pistol in hand, aim  the crowd, and pull the trigger with joy'.In short, this is the simplest surreal activity.Dali said that the arrogant audience accepted the cinema without knowing the moral position of the film, perhaps because they were the victims of the brutality of that Andalusian dog.

More than half a century has passed since World War II ended.We have brought back  now to the barren ice age of art that has forced to enter the cinema into the stagnant world of Dali and Buluel's time.We are in a state of complacency. At every moment, in the midst of shameless propaganda of freedom, religion, politics, sexuality, in the form of pieces of chain built by the state, are clinging to us like a joke.

At the end of this unbearable hour, our movie is waiting for the darkness when Andalusian dog will jump again in a night dream,and all our satisfying narratives will be a violent fuss.Isn't that the right time to call that pooch to save our art and cinema? The time has come to think it twice, let's do that.

            Should Surrealism prevail in modern cinema?

Close Eyes,Keep Mum

ABHIRUP PAL:Are you a supporter of right-wing or extreme right-wing?

Ummm....

Okay,then are you fundamentally left?

May be....

When even you think about the left period, don't you get irritated?

Sometimes...

Then what is the way?To be a ultra leftist or to hate all groups?Not to be either a shoe or an umbrella,is a good choice enough?Which is more desirable,honesty or real signature? You might have liked to be stubborn, but now you are doing something different because otherwise you wil be looked like a spineless in the eyes of your friends. Isn't that self dishonesty? Take it again as example,you know Hitler will win the vote again this time.But you damn care of this fucking democracy and you avoid your vote.Is it a well decision? 

                   Does NOTA has any relevance?

Are you really indifferent of what is going on? Don't you have any responsiblity? But to whom are you responsible, to History?Aren't you feel that you are just a part of that history?This life which you know as your own, is a  great hoax.So what does it mean to say that history is the sum of society? You don't have to know all the history if you may decide to do so. Only say it to your own and then you can neutralize yourself,hope so. 

But then, why and how can you support the farmers in the peasant movement? In your opinion, the state is now a champion of communal and anti-progressive thinking, am I right? So can I say  you are only a camper nothing much that ? Or is it too straightforward for you to say that what the powerful are doing is inevitably wrong and taking the side of the powerless is always by default a good decision? If the rickshaw puller is hit by an expensive car, it is definitely the driver's fault,isn't it? Now if you study and understand that the government's reform efforts are right, can you say it out loud? Or will you get the fear of removing communal power from your side? Or Will you keep silent? If you do so, then think,are you less dangerous than 'DeshVakts'?

                What to do when life give you lemon

                    Rape a common Phenomenon 

Now look, you may become very angry witnessing the rape and murder of that 8 years old girl from Jorabagan, but can you open your voice and become fearless to call the Asifa incident of Kashmir as a murder? You can't
because it was a devil's plan to punish a certain community.Against whom will you raise your voice is absolutely your choice But at first think of the incident in Bhopal where a Dalit woman was raped and the police quickly tried to burn her body without the family's permission or think of  that 31-day-old girl's murder whose mother drowned her alive in a water drum, tightened the lid and said to the police that she wanted a boy,so she murdered her out of gurge.After that can you say your initial happiness and social responsibility will remain intact?

                         New policy ,new problem?

                              An unforgotten verdict

You can congratulate to Priya Ramani as an Indian model of the Mithu movement against whom the court has dropped the defamation suit filed by MJ Akbar and says a woman can file a complaint of sexual harassment after many days or even decades after harassment or even you can question the victim as a representative of patriarchy ,'Why were you silent for so long time?'If your opinion is not clear enough after knowing the different judgments of the society's own independent court, then what will be your position? When those who are innocent but accused and news media pressurize them to sell as certain products if you keep quiet to avoid all the troubles, the responsibility will not be so much. But if you are  little thoughtful or think yourself as an intellectual, then according to the ancient proverb of civilization, you can say that the social responsibility of the artist is greater than that of the common man. So I have to speak.But what is the basis of this statement?Farmer has to use his intellect to pull the plow, then why do you get extra caress?

Should they be adored,what karnataka says?

To whom the artist should be highly responsible then,to the society or to the art?What is the artist's manifesto to the art?If he see injustice should he spread the protest or only entertain the art?Why no one has the right to play the violin while the city is burning?What if he pays taxes properly in past?Should we judge him if he plays with the influence of his pursuit and he has a talent of outstanding innovation which will perhaps give a miraculous relief after many decades of extinguishing this terrible fire?In your fiery glass house why are you suffering from only dizziness and confusion all the time now?Let's go as it is.Take one bite of phuchka with one bite of social consciousness.Don't try to exchange if you are ambidextrous and mix them all again,man. Please keep quiet.

                           Keep quiet,Sound in time

A Crisis of What?

ABHIRUP PAL: It has been a long time since when a disparate practice started.However, the number of families who are unhappy with the birth of a daughter is not small even today.The tendency to send a girl to the next house as soon as possible through child marriage has also remained as a practice in this poor country.In fact, the driving force behind the survival of the patriarchy, such as Brahmanism, Manuism, Fundamentalism, Fascism, is flowing here with a fullpace.Fights  also started.But it will remain incomplete if a defendant of fascism surrenders to the petty interests of Brahmanism.When we are speaking against fundamentalism and on the other hand hate Dalits, then doesn't self-contradiction arise in our own struggle?

To explain society, one needs not numbers, but self-awareness. Suppose I want to change society but I do not want to change the environment around myself, is it possible to change a greater society?When discussing the divisions created by gender inequality and sexuality,it is safe to say that gender inequality is a product of economic inequality .In fact, the economically dominant class seeks to perpetuate gender-based persecution due to financial inequality through the use of religion and it is religious bigotry that kills people in the name of love jihad or rapes girls by men to break the love of homosexuals.Consider this example,after the rape and murder of Manisha Valmiki ,the religious leaders were of the opinion that although the body of the girl was unclean, her vagina was sacred, so this rape  agrees the scripture,isn't  it commendable? 

In fact, these are attempts to save dying capitalism.From the point of view of male dominance towards sexual production and control when a child  is produced through sexual intercourse a female  has to suffer the most. Despite of that a mentality is sustained that male domination will prevail in society, politics and economy with full ease.The question is right here. Is male domination really spreading, over the sex? Now the question arises a woman who has a child in her womb can be considered weak? And if we consider it as fact, can homecorner be called happy then?

If marginalized men and women along with third gender and other sex community join in the movement for rights then there will come a danger for capitalisf.For that reason I think this process of inequality continues by an invisible hand.After having the strong control over system why the low mentality of the male workers comes out?If the working class of the female or marginalized genders understand that then there will be a united struggle for their position irrespective of gender.I think that's why they get fear.In many countries  capitalism is now recognizing homosexuality or other sexual positions.This does not mean that the capitalist  is doing a favor.Encouraged by such news, someone  can think that progressive thinking is spreading, but it is a myth.Actually it is at all an attempt to perpetuate exploitation and deprivation.

Capitalism and patriarchy combine to aggravate the oppression of women

                     Capitalism is constantly turning the thinking, sometimes in the name of religion, sometimes using the caste. Continuous efforts are being made to empower men in society.Suppose  in our country someone is homosexual and doing duty in the army. But can't say his or her identity openly.Whether it can be called an environment of freedom?The state never insists that strict action will be taken if people of the third sex are oppressed.This is the fair policy of capitalism-giving rights in law and harassments in practice.

In the deepening economic crisis the capitalist world economy is widening the divisions and that is where our country and its political structure are facing its destructive  situation. Many girls are now working in multinational companies. The country's finance minister and state's chief minister are women. From that many will expect that there will be huge opportunity for girls.But the state, however, does not recognize the equality of the system.The economic crisis has created a crisis of overproduction that has shrunk the world of labor,where the profit of capitalism will be small if everyone is alloted with work.

On the other hand, those who discriminate on the basis of gender and religion will die in the field.We can make fun of sex workers easily. But have you ever wondered  the workers who lost their jobs in the closed tea gardens  may be became sex workers to put food in the mouths of their children only?Maybe now sex workers are not only women, but also people of marginal sex and in this world everytype is enjoyed by men. So all the changes will come when there will be a way for everyone to survive economically. 

There is no point in throwing a golden stone just by talking about power, be it a woman or marginalized sex if they spend their days relying on man, communism will sound like a fairy tale.Those who think that to empower women or marginalized people  and to break patriarchal system they should be supported by power, I think they should be judged if patriarchy is hidden somewhere in their minds.

If you can't break the gender barrier while you promoting the ideology that you believe in, then the light will not reach even if the ideology is reached. Clearly understand,that the enemy of equality is not men but division.It may not take knowledge to understand everything, it requires acceptance of everything to make a change,isn't it?And are we ready for that?